https://www.enterair.pl/slot-gacor/

ANATOMICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REASONING OF LIVER RESECTION USING HYDRODISSECTION TECHNIQUE

Keywords: liver, resection, cryohemostasis, hemostatic sponge, TachoComb, electrocoagulation, histological image

Abstract

Background. Due to an increasing number of liver surgery, the problems of using secure hemostatic techniques during its resection are still relevant and require further study. Objective. To determine the optimal technique of local hemostasis during liver resection based on a comparative morphological assessment of the liver wound. Material and methods. The study was performed on 30 outbred white rats using local hemostatic techniques with further morphological examination of biological material on 7th and 21st days. Results. It has been established that cryohemostasis, electrocoagulation and local application methods of hemostasis are adequate ways to stop blood loss from a wound during liver resection. The analysis of the histological image of micro-preparations showed that the inflammatory response is present in all experiment series, regardless of hemostatic techniques. The disadvantage of using a TachoComb sponge is the need for its fixation to the wound surface, that of a collagen hemostatic sponge – a long period of its resorption, that of electrocoagulation – a damaging effect on liver tissue with marked inflammation. Conclusions. Local cryohemostasis appeared to be the most effective bleeding control technique. Its advantages are the following: it stops bleeding much faster than application techniques; it is characterized by minimal abdominal adhesions; it has a less pronounced damaging effect on liver parenchyma; it facilitates scar tissue formation and it is less likely to cause inflammatory changes in the resection zone.

References

Parhisenko YA, Vorontsov AK, Vorontsov KE, Bezaltynnyh AA. Analiz rezul’tatov hirurgicheskogo lechenija pacientov s travmaticheskimi povrezhdenijami pecheni [Analysis of the results of surgical treatment of patients with trauma of the liver]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovanija [Perspectives of science and education]. 2018;31(1):245-250. edn: YQAMXS. (Russian).

Alperovich BI. Hirurgija pecheni. Moscow: GEOTAR Media; 2010. 352 p. (Russian).

Bagnenko SF, Popov VA, Bojarkin MN, Chikin AE. Kombinirovannyj sposob gemostaza pri travme parenhimatoznyh organov. In: Tezisy XIV Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa hirurgov-gepatologov stran SNG; 2007 Sept 19-21; St. Petersburg; 2007. р. 247-248. (Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii; vol. 12, no.3). (Russian).

Pahlevanyan VG, Kolesnikov SA. Gemostaz v hirurgii parenhimatoznyh organov brjushnoj polosti. Obzor literatury [Hemostasis abdominal parenchymal organs in surgery. Review literature]. Vestnik hirurgicheskoj gastrojenterologii [Herald of surgical gastroenterology]. 2015;1-2:50-56. edn: VWZEYX. (Russian).

Baldoni F, Di Saverio S, Antonacci N, Coniglio C, Giugni A, Montanari N, Biscardi A, Villani S, Gordini G, Tugnoli G. Refinement in the technique of perihepatic packing: a safe and effective surgical hemostasis and multidisciplinary approach can improve the outcome in severe liver trauma. American Journal of Surgery. 2011;201(1):e5-e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.015.

Letoublon C, Morra I, Chen Y, Monnin V, Voirin D, Arvieux C. Hepatic arterial embolization in the management of blunt hepatic trauma: indications and complications. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2011;70(5):1032-1036. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31820e7ca1.

Gorsky VA, Zryanin AM, Agapov MA. Jeffektivnost’ ispol’zovanija TahoKomba v gepatobiliarnoj hirurgii [The effectiveness of TachoComb use in hepatobiliary surgery]. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine [Modern technologies in medicine]. 2011;2:61-68. edn: NXTLFX. (Russian).

Lipatov VA, Severinov DA, Saakyan AR. Lokal’nye gemostatiki v hirurgii XXI veka (obzor literatury) [Local applicational blood reestablishing instruments in surgery of the XXI century (literary review)]. Innova. 2019;1(14):16-20. https://doi.org/10.21626/innova/2019.1/03. https://www.elibrary.ru/nwydbu. (Russian).

Gushcha TS. Sravnitelnaja ocenka gemostaticheskoj aktivnosti applikacionnyh sredstv pri rezekcii pecheni v jeksperimente. In: Krotkova EN, executive ed. Aktualnye problemy mediciny. Sbornik materialov itogovoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii; 2021 Jan 28-29. Grodno: GrSMU; 2021. p. 228-231. edn: OCTXAZ. (Russian).

Aleksandrov VV, Maskin SS, Igolkina LA, Ermolaeva NK. Perspektivy ispol’zovanija lokal’nogo kriogemostaza pri travmah pecheni i selezjonki [Prospects for the use of local cryohemostasis in cases of liver and splenic trauma]. Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik [Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin]. 2013;7:45-51. edn: RSKHHF. (Russian).

Gushcha TS, Kiselevskiy YuM, Kudlo VV. Sravnitelnyj analiz gemostaticheskih svojstv lokalnogo kriogemostaza i jelektrokoaguljacii pri rezekcii pecheni v jeksperimente. In: Lyzikov AN, executive ed. Aktualnye problemy mediciny [Internet]. Sbornik statej Respublikanskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem; 2019 Nov 21-22; Gomel. Gomel: GSMU; 2019. Vol. 3; p. 24-25. Available from: clck.ru/34Khui. (Russian).

Gushcha TS, Kudlo VV, Kiselevskiy YuM. Gemostaz ran pecheni pri travmaticheskih povrezhdenijah v jeksperimente. In: Vostrecov AI, executive ed. Novaja nauka: sovremennoe sostojanie i puti razvitija. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj (zaochnoj) nauchnoj konferencii; 2022 Jun 20; Neftekamsk, Bashkortostan. Neftekamsk: NIC Mir nauki; 2022. p. 227-235. edn: XCSKLX. (Russian).

Published
2023-06-13
How to Cite
1.
Zuk IG, Lozhko PM, Kudlo VV, Gushcha TS, Kiselevskiy YM. ANATOMICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REASONING OF LIVER RESECTION USING HYDRODISSECTION TECHNIQUE. journalHandG [Internet]. 2023Jun.13 [cited 2024May18];7(1):37-2. Available from: http://hepatogastro.grsmu.by/index.php/journalHandG/article/view/299
Section
Оригинальные исследования
https://cbt20.fk.uns.ac.id/terbaru/https://djpen.kemendag.go.id/papamama/demo/http://ct.if.unsoed.ac.id/menang/https://ilmupolitik.uinsgd.ac.id/-/demo/https://pakbejo.jatengprov.go.id/-/demo/